Curve Finance vs rhino.fi

Curve Finance3.5/5

VS

rhino.fi4.0/5

Feature	Curve FinanceVisit	rhino.fiVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.5/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Liquidity & pricing	4.5	4.0
Fees	3.0	3.5
Security	3.0	4.0
Ease of use	3.0	4.0
Chain coverage	4.5	4.5
Specs
Type	AMM	Not disclosed
Chains	Ethereum, Arbitrum, Other	Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, TON, Tron, Other
Cross-chain swaps	Not disclosed	Yes
Audited	Yes	Yes
Governance token	CRV	DVF
Perpetual futures	No	No
Routes across other DEXs	Not disclosed	No
Points or rewards program	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2020	2019
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	1kx	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Designed for low-slippage stablecoin swaps About $1.22B TVL on 16 October 2026 Deployments span Ethereum and many additional chains LlamaLend V2 supports isolated lending markets	Near-instant cross-chain execution settling in under 10 seconds Covers more than 30 blockchains including EVM networks, Solana, Tron, and Bitcoin Proprietary liquidity network eliminates third-party DEX aggregator slippage Smart contracts audited by PeckShield and CryptoExperts
Cons	AMM trades remain exposed to slippage and MEV Long-tail pools can have thin liquidity LP yields can depend on CRV incentives Lending markets add liquidation and collateral risk	No swapping into ETH or BNB when bridging across chains Enterprise API access requires fixed monthly subscription plans Mandatory KYT screening applies to incoming deposits Sending from smart contracts is restricted on selected networks like Base
Best for	Stablecoin swapping, Correlated-asset trading, Curve LP holders	Cross-chain stablecoin bridging, Fintechs needing multi-chain deposits, Merchants accepting crypto payments

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons