Chainstack vs XYO

Chainstack4.3/5

VS

XYO3.2/5

Feature	ChainstackVisit	XYOVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.2/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	3.5
Chain coverage	4.5	3.0
Pricing	4.0	3.0
Developer experience	4.5	3.5
Support	4.0	3.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Indexing	Oracle, Developer tooling
Chains supported	70	3
Free tier	Yes	Yes
Pricing from	$49/month	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Open source	Not disclosed	Yes
Token	Not disclosed	XYO
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS	Not disclosed
Server regions	10+ global data centers	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2018	2017
Headquarters	Singapore	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	70+ supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and X Layer Free tier includes 3 million monthly request units Global Nodes route requests across 10+ data centers Self-Hosted keeps node deployment on customer-owned infrastructure	Eliminates full archive node storage requirements using Lookback Windows and Bound Witness Trees Supports Ethereum and Solana, with Chainlink collaboration Operational track record in decentralized geospatial verification running since 2018
Cons	Paid plans begin at $49 per month after the free tier Managed endpoints create dependence on Chainstack routing and node operations Dedicated Nodes start at $678 per month Global routing can add infrastructure and provider concentration risk	Layer One transaction gas is paid in XL1 tokens Sparse hardware presence in rural regions limits real-time physical confirmation coverage
Best for	Multichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure	DePIN developers tracking physical assets, Teams building location-dependent smart contracts, AI developers requiring verifiable real-world inputs

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons