Chainstack vs Quicknode
How Chainstack vs Quicknode compare on our ratings, infrastructure provider specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Reliability | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Chain coverage | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Pricing | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Developer experience | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Support | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Services | RPC / nodes, Indexing | RPC / nodes, Data APIs |
| Chains supported | 70 | 76 |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing from | $49/month | Not disclosed |
| Enterprise SLA | Yes | Yes |
| Uptime SLA | 99.99% | 99.99% |
| Free tier limits | 3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS | Not disclosed |
| Server regions | 10+ global data centers | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | 10T Holdings, Tiger Global Management, 776, SoftBank |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Multichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure | Web3 developers needing high-throughput RPC endpoints, Teams building real-time data pipelines with node filtering, Enterprises requiring SOC 2 certified node operations |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.