Chainstack vs Issuance

How Chainstack vs Issuance compare on our ratings, infrastructure provider specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/52.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Reliability4.53.5
Chain coverage4.52.0
Pricing4.02.5
Developer experience4.52.5
Support4.03.5
Specs
ServicesRPC / nodes, IndexingNot disclosed
Chains supported70Not disclosed
Free tier Yes No
Pricing from$49/monthMonthly license plus processing fees
Enterprise SLA YesNot disclosed
Open sourceNot disclosed No
Uptime SLA99.99%Not disclosed
Free tier limits3M request units/month, up to 25 RPSNot disclosed
Server regions10+ global data centersNot disclosed
Company
Founded20182018
HeadquartersSingaporeUnited States
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • 70+ supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and X Layer
  • Free tier includes 3 million monthly request units
  • Global Nodes route requests across 10+ data centers
  • Self-Hosted keeps node deployment on customer-owned infrastructure
  • Supports Reg A+, Reg D, and Reg CF offerings on one platform
  • SEC-registered and FINRA-member subsidiary handles regulated Reg CF rounds
  • Processed more than $300M across over 100 customer raises
  • Integrates directly with common marketing analytics and ad conversion pixels
Cons
  • Paid plans begin at $49 per month after the free tier
  • Managed endpoints create dependence on Chainstack routing and node operations
  • Dedicated Nodes start at $678 per month
  • Global routing can add infrastructure and provider concentration risk
  • Software licensing fees and processing rates are not published upfront
  • Issuance does not provide investor marketing or broker-dealer advisory services
  • Restricted to US securities exemptions; Reg D 506(c) requires accredited investor verification
  • Issuers choose their own securities lawyers, broker-dealers, transfer agents, and escrow partners
Best forMultichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructureGrowth companies running Reg A+ offerings, Startups executing Reg CF community rounds, Firms raising accredited capital via Reg D

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons