Chainstack vs Chronicle

Chainstack4.3/5

VS

Chronicle3.6/5

Feature	ChainstackVisit	ChronicleVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	3.5
Pricing	4.0	3.0
Developer experience	4.5	3.5
Support	4.0	3.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Indexing	Oracle
Chains supported	70	Not disclosed
Free tier	Yes	Not disclosed
Pricing from	$49/month	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS	Not disclosed
Server regions	10+ global data centers	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2018	—
Headquarters	Singapore	Switzerland
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	70+ supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and X Layer Free tier includes 3 million monthly request units Global Nodes route requests across 10+ data centers Self-Hosted keeps node deployment on customer-owned infrastructure	Originated inside MakerDAO in 2017 Provides collateral feeds for protocols including Sky, Morpho, and Centrifuge Specialized Proof of Asset framework for verifiable tokenized real-world collateral
Cons	Paid plans begin at $49 per month after the free tier Managed endpoints create dependence on Chainstack routing and node operations Dedicated Nodes start at $678 per month Global routing can add infrastructure and provider concentration risk	Heavy exposure to off-chain appraisal quality for tokenized asset feeds Developer integration details are not as widely self-serve as generalist oracles
Best for	Multichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure	Protocols lending against real-world assets, DeFi platforms requiring collateral data, Protocols using tokenized real-world assets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons