Cake Wallet vs Zerion

How Cake Wallet vs Zerion compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Zerion3.9/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.53.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support4.04.5
Features4.04.5
Privacy5.03.0
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
Wallet typeMobile, DesktopMobile, Browser extension, Web, Smart contract wallet
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, OtherEthereum
PlatformsiOS, Android, macOS, LinuxiOS, Android, Chrome
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
NFT supportNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in app YesNot disclosed
Security featuresPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-FeeSelf-custody, Public browser-extension code, Independent audits, Ledger support
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser No Yes
Swap feeNot disclosed0.67%
Perpetuals trading No Yes
Company
Founded20182016
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedAlliance, Placeholder, Signum Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
  • Self-custodial wallet with Ledger support
  • 66-chain coverage includes EVM networks and Solana
  • Browser extension source code is public
  • No Zerion fee for sending or receiving crypto
Cons
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
  • Built-in swaps and bridges charge a 0.67% service fee
  • Seed-phrase loss and phishing remain self-custody risks
  • Perps and tokenized assets add product and counterparty exposure
  • A phishing incident involving $100,000 was recorded on April 14, 2026
Best forMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware walletsMultichain portfolio management, EVM and Solana users, Ledger users managing DeFi positions

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons