Cake Wallet vs Solflare

How Cake Wallet vs Solflare compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.53.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support4.02.5
Features4.04.5
Privacy5.03.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, DesktopMobile, Browser extension, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, OtherSolana
PlatformsiOS, Android, macOS, LinuxiOS, Android, Chrome
Open source YesNot disclosed
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
NFT supportNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
Security featuresPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-FeeSelf-custody, Hardware-wallet integration, Google and Apple Quick Login
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser NoNot disclosed
Perpetuals trading No Yes
Company
Founded20182020
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedAlliance
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
  • Self-custodial Solana wallet with mobile, web and Chrome access
  • Hardware-wallet integration supports a separate signing device
  • Native staking has no separate Solflare platform fee
  • 4M+ active users reported by Solflare
Cons
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
  • Solana-focused chain support limits use outside the ecosystem
  • Seed phrase loss and phishing remain self-custody risks
  • Bridge, cards, perps and xStocks add external-provider exposure
  • Instant Unstake costs approximately 0.5% to 3%
Best forMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware walletsSolana asset holders, SOL stakers, Solana NFT collectors

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons