Cake Wallet vs Rabby

How Cake Wallet vs Rabby compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Rabby3.8/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.8/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support4.04.0
Features4.04.0
Privacy5.03.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, DesktopMobile, Browser extension, Desktop
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, OtherEthereum
PlatformsiOS, Android, macOS, LinuxChrome, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android
Open source YesNot disclosed
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app YesNot disclosed
Security featuresPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-FeeTransaction simulation, Risk alerts
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser No Yes
Swap feeNot disclosed0.25%
Perpetuals trading No Yes
Company
Founded2018—
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
  • Self-custodial custody keeps signing authority with the wallet holder
  • Transaction simulation flags risks before signing
  • Supports 22 EVM networks as of June 2026
  • Available on browser, desktop and mobile platforms
Cons
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
  • EVM-only support excludes Bitcoin and Solana
  • Users remain responsible for seed-phrase security and phishing risks
  • Browser-extension vulnerabilities can expose signing activity
  • Swap costs include a 0.25% service fee plus network costs
Best forMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware walletsMultichain EVM users, DeFi application users, Hardware wallet users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons