Cake Wallet vs OWNR Wallet

How Cake Wallet vs OWNR Wallet compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.53.5
Ease of use4.03.5
Chain support4.02.5
Features4.03.5
Privacy5.03.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, DesktopMobile, Desktop
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, OtherBitcoin, Ethereum, Tron, Other
PlatformsiOS, Android, macOS, LinuxiOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux
Open source YesNot disclosed
Hardware wallet support YesNot disclosed
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
Security featuresPIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-FeePIN protection, Biometric authentication, Seed phrase backup
Recovery without a seed phrase No No
Passkey loginNot disclosed No
Built-in dApp browser NoNot disclosed
Perpetuals trading No No
Company
Founded20182025
Headquarters—Estonia
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fully open source under the MIT license
  • Self-custodial design requires no user account creation or identity verification
  • Built-in Tor routing conceals IP addresses when broadcasting transactions
  • Integrates hardware signing devices alongside an air-gapped phone signing option
  • Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and seed phrases under user control
  • Supports SegWit addresses for lower transaction fees on Bitcoin transfers
  • Available natively across desktop operating systems and mobile devices
  • Integrated card off-ramping allows direct sales back to payment cards
Cons
  • Native in-app bridging is restricted to USDT across Ethereum, Polygon, and Arbitrum
  • In-app exchange rates and fiat purchases carry external third-party provider fees
  • Fee customization and bumping tools are unavailable on Solana, Tron, and Arbitrum
  • Requires users to manage seed phrase backups without automated social recovery
  • Card purchase fees are relatively high at 4% plus 3 USD
  • Client software code is closed-source
  • Does not support hardware wallet connections like Ledger or Trezor
  • Card purchases and off-ramps require identity verification
Best forMonero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware walletsDesktop and mobile multi-asset management, Buying crypto directly with bank cards, Users needing 24-word seed recovery options

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons