BTC Direct vs Onramper

BTC Direct3.8/5

VS

Onramper4.0/5

Feature	BTC DirectVisit	OnramperVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.0	3.5
Coverage	4.0	4.5
Payment methods	4.0	4.5
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Support	4.0	3.5
Specs
Service	On-ramp, Off-ramp, Widget / API	On-ramp, Off-ramp, Widget / API, Aggregator
Payment methods	Card, Bank transfer, SEPA	Card, Bank transfer, Apple Pay, Google Pay
Typical fee	Not disclosed	Generally no added fee for end users; the underlying provider sets the transaction rate.
Countries	Not disclosed	190
Assets	26	2,000
Minimum purchase	$30	Not disclosed
Developer widget / API	Yes	Yes
KYC required	Yes	Yes
Sell to fiat (off-ramp)	Yes	Yes
Apple Pay	Not disclosed	Yes
Delivery time	2 minutes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2013	—
Headquarters	Netherlands	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	MiCAR licensed under AFM authorization 41000009 Supports iDEAL, bank transfer and credit card payments Available across SEPA countries Offers direct-to-wallet delivery and Ledger integration	30+ onramp providers through one integration 175+ payment methods across 190+ countries More than 1,500 supported cryptocurrencies Routing considers fees and KYC friction
Cons	KYC is required before purchasing Availability is limited to SEPA countries The exchange rate is set when payment is received Private Trading Desk access starts at €50,000	Final fees and spreads depend on the selected ramp KYC, approval and settlement depend on third-party providers Regional asset and payment coverage varies by country Payments can be rejected, reversed or held for compliance review
Best for	EU customers using SEPA payments, Direct-to-wallet crypto purchases, Partner wallet integrations	Wallet and exchange developers, Apps needing global payment coverage, Businesses adding offramp flows

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons