Bitkey vs ELLIPAL

Bitkey3.2/5

VS

ELLIPAL4.1/5

Feature	BitkeyVisit	ELLIPALVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.2/5	4.1/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	4.0	4.5
Build & design	3.0	4.5
Ease of use	3.5	3.5
Coin support	2.0	4.5
Value for money	3.0	3.5
Specs
Price from	Not disclosed	$169
Connectivity	Not disclosed	QR code (air-gapped), microSD
Secure element	Not disclosed	Yes
Firmware	Not disclosed	Closed source
Display	Touchscreen	Touchscreen
Air-gapped signing	Not disclosed	Yes
Bitcoin-only	Yes	No
Supported assets	1	10,000
Battery	Not disclosed	Yes
Multisig support	Yes	Not disclosed
Companion app	Bitkey App	ELLIPAL mobile app for iOS and Android
Touchscreen	Yes	Yes
Backup options	Built-in recovery, Inheritance	Seed phrase recovery sheets, MicroSD card
Company
Founded	2023	2018
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	2-of-3 multisig avoids reliance on one signing key Bitcoin-only design keeps supported assets focused Bitkey with Screen verifies transactions on the device Recovery system includes a third key and inheritance tools	QR-only signing keeps the wallet physically separate from phones CC EAL5+ secure element protects Titan 2.0 key storage Intrusion detection wipes stored data after physical opening Supports more than 10,000 cryptocurrencies
Cons	Server-held key creates reliance on Block's recovery infrastructure Supports Bitcoin only, excluding other coins and tokens August 2026 security fixes covered recovery and notification features	Titan 2.0 firmware is proprietary and closed-source $169 price Physical opening can wipe stored data Seed phrase loss can make wiped funds unrecoverable
Best for	Long-term Bitcoin self-custody, Bitcoin-only holders, Multisig recovery planning	Long-term self-custody, QR-based transaction signing, Touchscreen wallet users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons