BitGo vs Komainu

How BitGo vs Komainu compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Komainu3.9/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Compliance4.54.0
Asset support4.54.5
Features4.53.5
Support4.53.5
Specs
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareQualified custodian, MPC, HSM
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)Up to $820M of specie capacity for clients to buy their own ring-fenced cover, alongside Komainu's own insurance program
Assets supported1,7706,000
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)JFSC fund services custodian registration (Jersey), JFSC virtual asset service provider registration (Jersey), VARA VASP license, virtual asset custody (Dubai, UAE), FCA MLR cryptoasset registration (UK)
MPC Yes Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20132018
HeadquartersUnited StatesJersey
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • JFSC custodian and depositary registration plus a VARA VASP custody license in Dubai
  • SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II attestations with ISO 27001 certification
  • HSM and MPC options, including air-gapped wallets that sign by QR code
  • Custody for 6,000+ tokens on 40+ blockchains in bankruptcy-remote, segregated wallets
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • The $820M specie capacity is cover that clients buy for themselves
  • Licensed entities only in Jersey, Dubai and the UK, with no EU or US company
  • Staking covers eight assets, a short list next to 40+ custody blockchains
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APIETP issuers that need a JFSC-regulated custodian, Asset managers issuing tokenized fund share classes, Trading firms using custody-held collateral on Deribit or Bybit

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons