BitGo vs Cobo

How BitGo vs Cobo compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

BitGo4.5/5
VS
Cobo3.6/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/53.6/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.53.5
Compliance4.52.5
Asset support4.54.5
Features4.54.5
Support4.53.5
Specs
KYC required Yes Yes
Custody modelQualified custodian, Multi-sig, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareMPC, HSM, Self-custody software
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated YesNot disclosed
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
InsuranceUp to $250M for assets where BitGo Bank & Trust holds all keys (Lloyd's of London and European market syndicate)Not disclosed
Assets supported1,7703,000
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration and state MTLs (US), SEC broker-dealer registration (US), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), VQF SRO membership under FINMA oversight (Switzerland), VARA custody license (Dubai, UAE), VARA broker-dealer license (Dubai, UAE), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), FINTRAC foreign MSB registration (Canada)Not disclosed
MPC Yes Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20132017
HeadquartersUnited StatesSingapore
InvestorsValor Equity Partners, Redpoint Ventures, Public, Galaxy Digital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Up to $250M insurance from a Lloyd's and European market syndicate where BitGo holds all keys
  • Qualified custody fully backed by cold storage, with over 95% of client assets held cold at the end of 2025
  • Licensed by the OCC, NYDFS, BaFin under MiCA, Dubai's VARA and Singapore's MAS
  • Over 1,770 supported assets as of December 31, 2025
  • Published Starter and Standard plans at $299 and $999 a month, with no cap on assets under custody
  • More than 3,000 tokens across 80+ chains through one WaaS 2.0 API
  • Custodial keys protected by HSMs and Intel SGX, with about 95% of funds in cold wallets
  • MPC wallets in which no single party, Cobo included, holds a complete key
Cons
  • Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting disclosed in its FY2025 10-K
  • Securities class action filed in June 2026, and the Galaxy Digital suit was awaiting a ruling as of August 2026
  • COO left in October 2026 and the CFO is transitioning out
  • Insurance excludes hot wallets and setups where clients hold keys
  • The custody license Cobo cites is a Hong Kong TCSP license; Singapore and Middle East licensing was still in progress in November 2025
  • Custodial wallets and 24/7 support require the custom-priced Enterprise plan
  • Custodial wallets cover fewer assets, 70+ chains and 2,000+ tokens, than the headline figures
Best forFunds and ETF issuers needing a long asset list and published insurance, Global firms that want licensed entities in the US, EU, Dubai and Singapore, Exchanges and fintechs building wallets on an APIExchanges and brokers that need custodial and MPC wallets behind one API, Payment and fintech companies building wallets for their own customers, Trading firms that want off-exchange settlement through SuperLoop

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons