Bitcoin Core vs Chainstack

How Bitcoin Core vs Chainstack compare on our ratings, infrastructure provider specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.3/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Reliability4.54.5
Chain coverage1.04.5
Pricing5.04.0
Developer experience4.04.5
Support1.54.0
Specs
ServicesRPC / nodes, Developer toolingRPC / nodes, Indexing
Chains supported170
Free tier Yes Yes
Pricing fromFree$49/month
Enterprise SLA No Yes
Open source YesNot disclosed
TokenBTCNot disclosed
Uptime SLANot disclosed99.99%
Free tier limitsUnlimited self-hosted use3M request units/month, up to 25 RPS
Server regionsGlobal10+ global data centers
Company
Founded20092018
Headquarters—Singapore
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Free MIT-licensed software
  • Validates the Bitcoin chain locally
  • Includes wallet and RPC access
  • Open contributor and public review model
  • 70+ supported chains, including Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and X Layer
  • Free tier includes 3 million monthly request units
  • Global Nodes route requests across 10+ data centers
  • Self-Hosted keeps node deployment on customer-owned infrastructure
Cons
  • Bitcoin-only chain support
  • Full ledger exceeded 608.9 GB in October 2024
  • Operators manage storage, bandwidth, upgrades, and uptime
  • A June 2026 bug could expose private broadcast IP addresses
  • Paid plans begin at $49 per month after the free tier
  • Managed endpoints create dependence on Chainstack routing and node operations
  • Dedicated Nodes start at $678 per month
  • Global routing can add infrastructure and provider concentration risk
Best forBitcoin node operators, Self-hosted RPC applications, Bitcoin wallet developersMultichain application teams, RPC-heavy trading systems, Enterprise blockchain infrastructure

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons