Binance.US vs Bitvavo

How Binance.US vs Bitvavo compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Bitvavo4.0/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees5.04.5
Security & trust4.03.5
Asset selection4.04.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Support3.53.5
Specs
MarketsSpot, OTCSpot, Margin
Maker fee0%0.15%
Taker fee0.02%0.25%
Coins listed200453
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, ACHBank transfer, Card, SEPA
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Accepts US customers Yes No
Proof of reserves YesNot disclosed
Staking / earn Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes
Licenses & registrationsFinCEN MSB, 32 US State Money Transmitter LicensesMiCA crypto-asset service provider authorization, Netherland, DNB registration as a digital asset service provider, Nether
Security featuresU.S.-based cold storage, Multi-factor authentication, SOC 2 Type II certified, ISO 27001 certified, ISO 27701 certifiedBitvavo Account Guarantee up to €100.000, Take-profit and stop-loss orders, Mobile app security features
Futures & perpetuals No No
Max leverage (x)Not disclosed10
Copy trading No No
P2P market No No
Earn / savings products Yes Yes
User protection fund NoNot disclosed
Referral program YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20192018
HeadquartersUnited StatesNetherlands
InvestorsRRE Ventures, Circle Ventures, Foundation Capital, Original Capital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • 0% maker fees across all 250+ spot trading pairs
  • Zero-fee fiat deposits and withdrawals through bank ACH transfers
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 third-party security audits
  • Staking support across 25+ proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies
  • MiCA-authorized exchange with Dutch Central Bank registration
  • 453 digital assets listed as of October 2026
  • Trading fees range from 0.00% to 0.25%
  • Supports SEPA and seven other euro payment methods
Cons
  • Unavailable to residents in 16 U.S. jurisdictions, including New York and Texas
  • ACH fiat deposits carry a mandatory 7-day withdrawal hold
  • Centralized custody model requires full trust in the exchange for fund safety
  • Mandatory KYC identity verification required before trading or depositing
  • Centralized custody exposes users to exchange counterparty risk
  • Margin trading adds borrowing costs and a 2% liquidation fee
  • Staking and lending are outside MiCA safeguards
  • Availability is limited to the European Economic Area
Best forU.S. spot traders placing limit orders, Investors seeking zero-fee ACH deposits, Proof-of-stake crypto holders earning rewardsEEA residents trading euros, Multi-asset spot traders, Recurring crypto buyers

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons