B2Broker vs Bullish

B2Broker4.2/5

VS

Bullish3.7/5

Feature	B2BrokerVisit	BullishVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.2/5	3.7/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	4.5
Security & trust	4.5	4.5
Asset selection	4.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.0
Support	4.5	3.0
Specs
Markets	Spot, Margin, Copy trading, OTC	Spot, Futures, Options
Maker fee	Not disclosed	0%
Taker fee	Not disclosed	0.03%
Fiat deposit methods	Bank transfer, Card	Not disclosed
KYC required	Yes	Not disclosed
Accepts US customers	Not disclosed	Yes
Proof of reserves	Not disclosed	Yes
Mobile app	Not disclosed	Yes
Licenses & registrations	Mauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRB	New York State Department of Financial Services, FinCEN Money Services Business registration, BaFin MiCAR license ID 10162355, Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission CE No BUQ956, Gibraltar Financial Services Commission GFSC 119714
Security features	Not disclosed	Full-reserve 1:1 customer assets, Segregated customer assets, Daily reconciliations, Offline private-key isolation, Transaction authorization controls, Deloitte audit
Futures & perpetuals	Yes	Yes
Max leverage (x)	1,000	Not disclosed
Copy trading	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2014	2021
Headquarters	—	Gibraltar
Investors	Not disclosed	Public investors, Alan Howard, Christian Angermayer, Louis Bacon +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Turnkey liquidity across 11 asset classes and 1,500 instruments via single margin Stablecoin settlements in USDT and USDC across 10 separate blockchains Regulated operating arms hold CySEC and Mauritius FSC licenses Established track record since 2014 with over 500 broker launches	NYSE-listed operator with quarterly public earnings reports Deloitte audits and stated 1:1 segregated reserves 0 bps maker fee on FX Markets Spot, options, perpetuals and futures share one portfolio-margin system
Cons	Does not accept retail traders or individual investor accounts Requires corporate counterparty clearing through distinct legal entities High leverage up to 1:1000 is restricted to unregulated jurisdictions	Centralized custody leaves assets exposed to exchange and operational risk Products and jurisdictions vary, with 50+ locations served selectively US and Hong Kong customers cannot access the full derivatives offering AMM instructions are restricted to eligible professional investors
Best for	Brokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programs	Institutional spot traders, Professional derivatives traders, API-connected trading firms

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons