AuthLN vs Tenderly

AuthLN3.0/5

VS

Tenderly4.3/5

Feature	AuthLNVisit	TenderlyVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.0/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	3.5	4.5
Chain coverage	3.0	4.5
Pricing	2.5	3.5
Developer experience	3.0	5.0
Support	3.0	4.0
Specs
Services	Developer tooling	Developer tooling
Chains supported	Not disclosed	50
Free tier	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	2024	2018
Headquarters	United States	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Holds two issued U.S. patents covering its identity and access architecture Integrates in front of Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Google, and JumpCloud without rerouting Logs walked-away connection attempts alongside standard successes and failures Requires no local agent installation or credential sharing for access reviews	Supports transaction simulation and debugging across 50+ EVM chains Provides Virtual TestNets synced directly with real-time on-chain state Raised $58.6M in funding from institutional backers including Spark Capital Offers a free tier for essential debugging and simulation tasks
Cons	Agent Authority product for automated sub-agent enforcement is not yet available SOC 2 Type II examination is not yet complete	Node RPC access requires a paid subscription plan Centralized monitoring infrastructure creates operational vendor dependency Focused exclusively on EVM networks without non-EVM support
Best for	Enterprise SOC teams auditing identity providers, Organizations tracking automated AI agent access, Environments requiring post-quantum authentication protocols	Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons