AtomicHub vs Courtyard

AtomicHub3.8/5

VS

Courtyard3.5/5

Feature	AtomicHubVisit	CourtyardVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.8/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	4.0
Selection	3.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Creator tools	4.0	2.5
Trust & safety	4.0	4.0
Specs
Chains	Polygon, Avalanche, Other	Polygon
Creator royalties	Enforced	Not disclosed
Focus	Gaming, Collectibles, Art	Collectibles
Launchpad	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	—	2021
Headquarters	Germany	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Forerunner Ventures, New Enterprise Associates, Burst Capital, Operator Partners +7
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over 63 million completed secondary sales across 141K collections Direct support for major gaming ecosystems including WAX, Polygon, and Immutable Self-custodial trading without centralized asset custody requirements Integrated creator suite for collection minting and royalty configuration	Polygon integration keeps network transaction costs low for trading physical cards Physical assets can be redeemed by burning the corresponding NFT Secured $37M in total venture backing from Forerunner Ventures, NEA, and Y Combinator Over 132,000 unique NFT holders active on the platform by October 2026
Cons	Smart contract dependency when bridging assets across distinct networks Secondary trading for niche gaming collections can experience low market liquidity Trading activity remains concentrated primarily on WAX-compatible gaming collections	Relies on centralized vault custody for storage and physical redemption Secondary liquidity drops sharply outside high-demand Pokémon cards Market floor prices fell roughly 96% from their February 2026 peak
Best for	WAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain drops	Graded Pokémon card collectors, Traders wanting instant physical liquidity, Collectors seeking insured asset vaulting

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons