AtomicHub vs Element: WAX focus or 27-chain reach

AtomicHub and Element are non-custodial NFT marketplaces, but they target different trading patterns. AtomicHub centers on gaming items and collectibles built around the AtomicAssets standard. It has recorded more than 63 million completed sales across 141,000 collections and supports WAX, Vaulta, EOS, XPR Network, Polygon, Immutable, and Avalanche. Its creator suite includes minting, public drops, custom royalty settings, and an Atomic Bridge for supported assets.

Element is a broader liquidity aggregator. It spans 27 blockchains, indexes more than 180 million collectibles, and combines its own order book with listings from OpenSea, LooksRare, and X2Y2. Its dashboards add floor charts and scatter plots. Element advertises gas subsidies for English auctions, while royalty enforcement depends on the integrated venue. AtomicHub's royalties are enforced. Both use connected self-custody wallets, while Element states that trading requires no KYC.

VS
Element3.7/5

Quick verdict

AtomicHub concentrates on WAX-compatible gaming activity and gives creators enforced royalties, pack opening, inventory tools, and cross-chain transfers through Atomic Bridge. Element reaches 27 networks and pulls listings from other venues, so its key edge is cross-market discovery rather than a single gaming standard. That breadth comes with a documented trade-off: 30-day trading volume was approximately $2.2K in October 2026, while royalty enforcement varies by venue. Both are non-custodial, so assets remain in connected user wallets rather than platform custody. Element has a CertiK smart-contract audit, and its English-auction gas subsidy can reduce transaction overhead. AtomicHub's record includes more than 63 million completed sales and 141,000 collections.

Choose AtomicHub if the required network is WAX, Vaulta, EOS, XPR Network, Polygon, Immutable, or Avalanche, and the priority is gaming inventory, creator royalty enforcement, or Atomic Bridge transfers. Its self-custody model keeps trading separate from centralized asset custody.

Choose Element if 27-chain access, listings from OpenSea, LooksRare, and X2Y2, or collection analytics matters more than a gaming-specific standard. Its no-KYC wallet trading, zero-cost minting support, CertiK audit, and English-auction gas subsidies are concrete advantages, while royalty rules follow the integrated venue.

Feature
Ratings
Our score3.8/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.54.0
Selection3.54.5
Ease of use4.03.5
Creator tools4.03.5
Trust & safety4.03.0
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed No
ChainsPolygon, Avalanche, OtherBNB Chain, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Polygon, Other
Creator royaltiesEnforcedNot disclosed
FocusGaming, Collectibles, ArtCollectibles, Gaming
Launchpad Yes Yes
Aggregates other marketsNot disclosed Yes
Zero marketplace feeNot disclosed No
Points or rewards programNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded—2021
HeadquartersGermany—
InvestorsNot disclosedDragonfly, SIG
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Over 63 million completed secondary sales across 141K collections
  • Direct support for major gaming ecosystems including WAX, Polygon, and Immutable
  • Self-custodial trading without centralized asset custody requirements
  • Integrated creator suite for collection minting and royalty configuration
  • Aggregates listings across 27 blockchains and external markets
  • Non-custodial trading requiring no KYC verification
  • Raised $11.5M from investors including Dragonfly Capital and SIG
  • Smart contracts audited by CertiK
Cons
  • Smart contract dependency when bridging assets across distinct networks
  • Secondary trading for niche gaming collections can experience low market liquidity
  • Trading activity remains concentrated primarily on WAX-compatible gaming collections
  • Low trading activity, with 30-day volume down to $2.2K in October 2026
  • Royalty enforcement varies based on underlying integrated venues
Best forWAX blockchain gaming collectors, Digital trading card enthusiasts, Creators launching multi-chain dropsMulti-chain NFT collectors, Traders comparing cross-market floor prices, Creators seeking zero-cost minting

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

FAQ

Is AtomicHub cheaper than Element?

Element advertises discounted trading costs and gas subsidies for English auctions. AtomicHub focuses on gaming marketplace features and creator royalty tools.

Which marketplace supports more blockchains?

Element supports 27 blockchains, while AtomicHub supports WAX, Vaulta, EOS, XPR Network, Polygon, Immutable, and Avalanche. Element also aggregates listings from external venues.

Are AtomicHub and Element custodial?

Both use non-custodial trading through connected self-custody wallets. Element also states that trading requires no KYC verification.

Does AtomicHub enforce NFT royalties?

Yes, AtomicHub enforces creator royalties and lets creators set custom royalty terms. Element's royalty enforcement varies by the underlying marketplace integrated into each listing.

Which platform has creator tools?

Both have creator tools, but they differ in scope. AtomicHub supports collection minting, scheduled drops, custom enforced royalties, and pack-based assets, while Element offers zero-cost minting and verified collection onboarding.

More comparisons