ARPA vs Tenderly

ARPA3.5/5

VS

Tenderly4.3/5

Feature	ARPAVisit	TenderlyVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.5/5	4.3/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	3.5	4.5
Chain coverage	3.5	4.5
Pricing	3.5	3.5
Developer experience	4.0	5.0
Support	3.0	4.0
Specs
Services	Oracle, Developer tooling, Staking infrastructure	Developer tooling
Chains supported	Not disclosed	50
Free tier	No	Yes
Pricing from	0.000002 ETH per request	Not disclosed
Open source	Yes	Not disclosed
Token	ARPA	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2018	2018
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	DeFiance Capital, Laser Digital, Animoca Brands, ArkStream Capital +2	Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	On-chain verification supports auditable randomness results Ethereum requests have a listed 0.000002 ETH flat fee Supports Ethereum, BNB Chain and ARPA Chain Mainnet has completed more than 224,000 computation tasks	Supports transaction simulation and debugging across 50+ EVM chains Provides Virtual TestNets synced directly with real-time on-chain state Raised $58.6M in funding from institutional backers including Spark Capital Offers a free tier for essential debugging and simulation tasks
Cons	Randomness requests require both protocol fees and blockchain transaction funds Applications depend on ARPA node participation and threshold coordination Staking rewards expose participants to ARPA token economics Cross-chain and custody uses add smart-contract and counterparty risk	Node RPC access requires a paid subscription plan Centralized monitoring infrastructure creates operational vendor dependency Focused exclusively on EVM networks without non-EVM support
Best for	On-chain game developers, Lottery and raffle applications, Solidity teams needing verifiable randomness	Smart contract protocol developers, DeFi risk engineering teams, Institutions managing multisig governance

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons