AnkerPay vs Cake Wallet
How AnkerPay vs Cake Wallet compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.0/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Chain support | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Features | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Privacy | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Not disclosed | No |
| Wallet type | Mobile, Desktop | Mobile, Desktop |
| Custody | Self-custodial | Self-custodial |
| Chains | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Tron, Other | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Tron, Other |
| Platforms | Android, iOS, Windows, macOS | iOS, Android, macOS, Linux |
| Open source | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Hardware wallet support | Not disclosed | Yes |
| In-app swaps | Yes | Yes |
| Staking | No | Not disclosed |
| Buy crypto in app | Yes | Yes |
| Security features | SPV verification, Private key export | PIN protection, Encrypted backups, Tor routing, Bitcoin Silent Payments, Coin control, Replace-by-Fee |
| Recovery without a seed phrase | Not disclosed | No |
| Built-in dApp browser | Not disclosed | No |
| Perpetuals trading | Not disclosed | No |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | 2018 |
| Headquarters | South Africa | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | South African crypto retail users, Traders using physical Bitcoin ATMs, Holders of UTXO payment coins | Monero and privacy-focused asset holders, Users routing transactions through Tor, Mobile users pairing hardware wallets |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

