Anchorage Digital vs Tangany

How Anchorage Digital vs Tangany compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Tangany3.7/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.03.5
Compliance4.04.0
Asset support4.04.0
Features4.53.5
Support4.03.5
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed Yes
Custody modelQualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody softwareQualified custodian, MPC, HSM
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worthInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, Retail
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report YesNot disclosed
Assets supportedNot disclosed250
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), NFA introducing broker registration (US)BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), BaFin qualified crypto custody license (Germany), BaFin PSD2 payment services license (Germany)
MPCNot disclosed Yes
Cold storage YesNot disclosed
Qualified custodian Yes Yes
Company
Founded2017—
HeadquartersUnited StatesGermany
InvestorsTether, KKR, GICNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Custody at an OCC-chartered national trust bank, in place since January 2021
  • SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports, with SOC 2 examinations since 2021
  • Staking and governance voting on 20+ networks without assets leaving custody
  • Atlas settlement supports off-exchange trading on Binance from custody
  • MiCA CASP authorization from BaFin since August 8, 2025, passported to every other EEA country
  • Crypto custody license under the German Banking Act held since October 2021
  • Keys protected with HSM and MPC, backed by ISO 27001:2022 certification
  • API-first platform with off-chain settlement and a sandbox on request
Cons
  • No insurance policy for digital assets appears in its custody disclosures
  • OCC consent order over BSA/AML deficiencies ran from April 2022 to August 2025
  • No EU authorization yet; the Irish MiCA application was announced in October 2026
  • No SOC 1 or SOC 2 report cited; ISO 27001:2022 is the listed certification
  • No cold storage tier described; keys sit in a cloud-hosted HSM and MPC setup
  • The FAQ says no fixed insurance limit can be guaranteed per customer
Best forETF issuers and asset managers that want a federally chartered custodian, Funds that stake or vote without moving assets out of custody, Trading firms using Binance with collateral held off-exchangeBanks and brokers in the EEA adding white-label crypto custody, Neobrokers and fintechs that integrate custody through an API, Stablecoin issuers and tokenization projects needing a MiCA-authorized custodian

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons