Anchorage Digital vs Fideum

How Anchorage Digital vs Fideum compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Fideum2.3/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/52.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.02.5
Compliance4.01.5
Asset support4.02.0
Features4.53.5
Support4.02.5
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed Yes
Custody modelQualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody softwareNot disclosed
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worthInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated YesNot disclosed
SOC 2 report YesNot disclosed
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), NFA introducing broker registration (US)Not disclosed
Cold storage YesNot disclosed
Qualified custodian Yes No
Company
Founded2017—
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
InvestorsTether, KKR, GICValereum PLC
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Custody at an OCC-chartered national trust bank, in place since January 2021
  • SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports, with SOC 2 examinations since 2021
  • Staking and governance voting on 20+ networks without assets leaving custody
  • Atlas settlement supports off-exchange trading on Binance from custody
  • Custody software, trading APIs, staking and payment orchestration under one contract and API
  • June 2026 Terms spell out roles: Fideum licenses software and the client safeguards signing material
  • Website cites MPC custody, HSM-backed keys and offline cold wallets paired with warm wallets
  • KYC, KYB, AML screening and Travel Rule tools sit on the same platform
Cons
  • No insurance policy for digital assets appears in its custody disclosures
  • OCC consent order over BSA/AML deficiencies ran from April 2022 to August 2025
  • No EU authorization yet; the Irish MiCA application was announced in October 2026
  • Website and Terms name no regulator, license type or registration number
  • Terms state Fideum is not a custodian of record, and the custodians it integrates are unnamed
  • Insurance and SOC controls are mentioned without a carrier, limit, report or auditor
  • No published list of supported assets or networks
Best forETF issuers and asset managers that want a federally chartered custodian, Funds that stake or vote without moving assets out of custody, Trading firms using Binance with collateral held off-exchangeFintechs and brokerages adding custody, trading and staking through one API, Banks and credit unions that already contract a licensed custodian and want key-management software, Payment firms settling in stablecoins and fiat across Fideum's 11 listed currencies

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons