Anchorage Digital vs Cobo

Anchorage Digital4.1/5

VS

Cobo3.6/5

Feature	Anchorage DigitalVisit	CoboVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.1/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security	4.0	3.5
Compliance	4.0	2.5
Asset support	4.0	4.5
Features	4.5	4.5
Support	4.0	3.5
Specs
KYC required	Not disclosed	Yes
Custody model	Qualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody software	MPC, HSM, Self-custody software
Clients	Institutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth	Institutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated	Yes	Not disclosed
SOC 2 report	Yes	Yes
Assets supported	Not disclosed	3,000
Staking	Yes	Yes
API access	Yes	Yes
Licenses & charters	OCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), NFA introducing broker registration (US)	Not disclosed
MPC	Not disclosed	Yes
Cold storage	Yes	Yes
Qualified custodian	Yes	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2017	2017
Headquarters	United States	Singapore
Investors	Tether, KKR, GIC	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Custody at an OCC-chartered national trust bank, in place since January 2021 SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports, with SOC 2 examinations since 2021 Staking and governance voting on 20+ networks without assets leaving custody Atlas settlement supports off-exchange trading on Binance from custody	Published Starter and Standard plans at $299 and $999 a month, with no cap on assets under custody More than 3,000 tokens across 80+ chains through one WaaS 2.0 API Custodial keys protected by HSMs and Intel SGX, with about 95% of funds in cold wallets MPC wallets in which no single party, Cobo included, holds a complete key
Cons	No insurance policy for digital assets appears in its custody disclosures OCC consent order over BSA/AML deficiencies ran from April 2022 to August 2025 No EU authorization yet; the Irish MiCA application was announced in October 2026	The custody license Cobo cites is a Hong Kong TCSP license; Singapore and Middle East licensing was still in progress in November 2025 Custodial wallets and 24/7 support require the custom-priced Enterprise plan Custodial wallets cover fewer assets, 70+ chains and 2,000+ tokens, than the headline figures
Best for	ETF issuers and asset managers that want a federally chartered custodian, Funds that stake or vote without moving assets out of custody, Trading firms using Binance with collateral held off-exchange	Exchanges and brokers that need custodial and MPC wallets behind one API, Payment and fintech companies building wallets for their own customers, Trading firms that want off-exchange settlement through SuperLoop

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons