AMINA Bank vs Anchorage Digital

How AMINA Bank vs Anchorage Digital compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Compliance4.54.0
Asset support3.54.0
Features4.04.5
Support4.04.0
Specs
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Custody modelQualified custodian, MPC, Multi-sig, HSMQualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody software
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worthInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 reportNot disclosed Yes
InsuranceProfessional indemnity and cyber insurance on hot wallets; professional indemnity, specie and cyber insurance on cold walletsNot disclosed
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersFINMA banking and securities dealer license (Switzerland), FINMA CISA custodian bank license (Switzerland), ADGM FSRA Financial Services Permission (UAE), SFC Type 1, 4, 9 licenses with VA dealing (Hong Kong), FMA MiCA CASP authorization (Austria)OCC national trust bank charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), MAS Major Payment Institution license (Singapore), NFA introducing broker registration (US)
MPC YesNot disclosed
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodian Yes Yes
Company
Founded20182017
HeadquartersSwitzerlandUnited States
InvestorsNot disclosedTether, KKR, GIC
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • FINMA-licensed Swiss bank with a separate CISA custodian license for Swiss funds
  • MiCA CASP authorization in Austria, with 30 EEA countries in ESMA's register
  • HSM and MPC hot wallets plus air-gapped cold storage with a multisig structure per client
  • Client crypto segregated under Swiss law and kept off the balance sheet
  • Custody at an OCC-chartered national trust bank, in place since January 2021
  • SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports, with SOC 2 examinations since 2021
  • Staking and governance voting on 20+ networks without assets leaving custody
  • Atlas settlement supports off-exchange trading on Binance from custody
Cons
  • Cold storage covers 12 of the 32 listed assets
  • Asset availability varies by jurisdiction
  • The Abu Dhabi branch can arrange custody but may not hold client assets or serve retail clients
  • No insurance policy for digital assets appears in its custody disclosures
  • OCC consent order over BSA/AML deficiencies ran from April 2022 to August 2025
  • No EU authorization yet; the Irish MiCA application was announced in October 2026
Best forProfessional investors and family offices that want custody, trading and staking at one Swiss bank, Swiss fund managers that need a CISA-licensed custodian bank, Private and cantonal banks adding crypto for their clientsETF issuers and asset managers that want a federally chartered custodian, Funds that stake or vote without moving assets out of custody, Trading firms using Binance with collateral held off-exchange

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons