Agoric vs Polygon

Agoric3.6/5

VS

Polygon4.1/5

Feature	AgoricVisit	PolygonVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.6/5	4.1/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Performance	3.5	4.5
Fees	4.0	4.5
Ecosystem	2.5	4.5
Decentralization	3.5	3.5
Developer experience	4.5	4.0
Specs
Layer	Layer 1	Sidechain
Consensus / design	Proof of Stake	Proof of Stake
Native token	BLD	POL
EVM compatible	No	Yes
Smart contract languages	JavaScript	Solidity
Typical transaction fee	Not disclosed	$0.002
Finality	Not disclosed	~1.8 seconds
Mainnet since	2,021	2,020
Throughput (TPS)	Not disclosed	5,000
Sequencer	Not applicable	Not applicable
Gas paid in	IST	POL
Company
Founded	2018	2020
Headquarters	—	Cayman Islands
Investors	Naval Ravikant, Polychain Capital, The Zcash Company	Peak XV Partners, Galaxy Digital, Republic Capital, SoftBank Vision Fund 2 +4
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Hardened JavaScript is used for smart contract development Zoe framework guarantees offer safety by refunding assets if a trade fails Multi-block execution coordinates workflows across IBC chains Transaction fees are paid in IST, while BLD covers cross-chain postage fees	Typical transaction fees average approximately $0.002 per transfer Settlement finality completes in roughly 1.8 seconds Full EVM execution environment supports standard Solidity tooling and libraries Processed over 8 billion transactions across more than $3.0 trillion in cumulative volume
Cons	No EVM compatibility requires rewriting existing Solidity smart contracts Direct on-chain TVL is low at about $116,000 in October 2026 Cross-chain execution depends on relayers, IBC endpoints, and third-party bridge infrastructure Asynchronous cross-chain settlement creates execution delay across remote chains	Relies on sidechain checkpoints rather than native Layer 2 zero-knowledge rollups Bridge smart contracts on Ethereum introduce third-party settlement and locking risks Past smart contract vulnerability resulted in the loss of 801,601 tokens in 2021 Separate Polygon zkEVM sequencer suffered an operational halt in July 2026
Best for	JavaScript developers entering Web3, Cross-chain DeFi yield automation, Complex multi-network app workflows	High-frequency stablecoin payment providers, Fintech developers seeking EVM compatibility, DeFi apps requiring sub-cent fees

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons