Agoric vs Ethereum
How Agoric vs Ethereum compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.6/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Performance | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Fees | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Ecosystem | 2.5 | 5.0 |
| Decentralization | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Developer experience | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Layer | Layer 1 | Layer 1 |
| Consensus / design | Proof of Stake | Proof of Stake |
| Native token | BLD | ETH |
| EVM compatible | No | Yes |
| Smart contract languages | JavaScript | Solidity, Vyper |
| Block time | Not disclosed | 12 seconds |
| Typical transaction fee | Not disclosed | 0.15 to 0.5 gwei |
| Finality | Not disclosed | 12.8 minutes |
| Mainnet since | 2,021 | 2,015 |
| Sequencer | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Data availability | Not disclosed | EIP-4844 blobs and calldata |
| Gas paid in | IST | ETH |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | — | Switzerland |
| Investors | Naval Ravikant, Polychain Capital, The Zcash Company | Public crowdsale participants |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | JavaScript developers entering Web3, Cross-chain DeFi yield automation, Complex multi-network app workflows | DeFi liquidity providers and traders, Smart contract developers using Solidity, Layer-2 rollup deployment teams |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

