Across Protocol vs Mayan

How Across Protocol vs Mayan compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Mayan4.2/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Speed5.04.5
Fees4.54.0
Chain coverage4.04.0
Ease of use4.54.5
Specs
KYC required No No
DesignIntent-basedIntent-based
ChainsEthereum, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, OtherSolana, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Sui, Hyperliquid, Other
Chains supported27Not disclosed
Typical feeNetwork gas and relayer fee with zero aggregator markupConfigurable integrator fee; dynamic driver execution costs
Typical transfer time1.2 seconds2 to 60 seconds
Security modelUMA optimistic oracleDepends on route: Swift auctions, Circle CCTP or Wormhole
Audited Yes Yes
TokenACXNot disclosed
Intent-based Yes Yes
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) Yes Yes
Max transfer$50,000,000$10,000,000
Company
Founded20212022
Headquarters——
InvestorsParadigm, Bain Capital Crypto, Coinbase Ventures, Multicoin Capital +3Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Average transfer speed of 1.2 seconds across supported chains
  • Over $40B in cumulative volume processed without loss of user deposits
  • Transfers use native assets without relying on wrapped tokens
  • No identity verification (KYC) required to bridge
  • Swaps tokens cross-chain in a single transaction without a manual secondary swap
  • Swift route settles native assets in as little as 2 seconds
  • Uses Circle CCTP for native USDC transfers without wrapped-asset depeg risk
  • Smart contracts audited by OtterSec and Sec3
Cons
  • July 2026 Solana relayer exploit resulted in $3.35M in stolen relayer funds
  • Relies on third-party relayers maintaining destination chain liquidity
  • Off-chain relayer bugs can temporarily pause specific chain routes
  • ACX governance token undergoing sunsetting and corporate restructuring
  • Unfilled orders must wait for a deadline to pass before issuing refunds
  • Execution relies on third-party driver liquidity and Circle or Wormhole messaging
  • Guaranteed price quotes apply only to select same-asset routes
Best forFast cross-chain Layer 2 bridging, DeFi traders avoiding wrapped assets, Large stablecoin institutional transfersSolana and EVM cross-chain traders, Users moving native USDC across networks, Traders lacking source chain native gas

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons