THORChain vs Uniswap
How THORChain vs Uniswap compare on our ratings, dex specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.2/5 | 4.1/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Liquidity & pricing | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Fees | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Security | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Chain coverage | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Type | AMM | AMM |
| Chains | Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Other | Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, Other |
| Swap fee | Source-network gas, destination-network gas and liquidity fees; total varies with network conditions, swap size and pool depth | Not disclosed |
| Limit orders | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Cross-chain swaps | Yes | Yes |
| Audited | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Governance token | RUNE | UNI |
| Perpetual futures | No | No |
| Routes across other DEXs | Not disclosed | Yes |
| MEV protection | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Mobile app | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Points or rewards program | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Public participants | Polychain Capital, BlackRock, Andreessen Horowitz, Paradigm +8 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Native Bitcoin swaps, Cross-chain self-custody trading, Wallet and app integrations | On-chain token traders, Concentrated liquidity providers, Developers building EVM swaps |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.