Squid vs Symbiosis

How Squid vs Symbiosis compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

Squid4.4/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.4/53.8/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.03.0
Speed4.54.0
Fees4.54.0
Chain coverage5.04.5
Ease of use4.54.0
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed No
DesignAggregatorLiquidity network
ChainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Cosmos, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, Tron, TON, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Hyperliquid, Other
Chains supported10050
Typical fee0% on stablecoin swaps; variable route and gas feesNot disclosed
Typical transfer time5sNot disclosed
Security modelDepends on the underlying routeNot disclosed
Audited Yes Yes
TokenQUIDSIS
Intent-based YesNot disclosed
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) Yes Yes
Max transferNot disclosed$1,000,000
Company
Founded20222021
HeadquartersVirgin Islands, British—
InvestorsNorth Island Ventures, Polychain CapitalDAO Maker, Avalanche Foundation, BTC Investment, Blockchain.com Ventures +9
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Routes across 100+ chains including non-EVM networks like Solana, XRPL, and Cosmos
  • Zero protocol fees charged on stablecoin swaps
  • Executes swaps in native tokens without issuing wrapped assets
  • Completed 9 security audits with no historical protocol exploits
  • Connects non-EVM chains like Bitcoin, Solana, and TON directly with EVM networks
  • Requires no account creation or KYC identity verification to bridge
  • Processed more than $10B in cumulative volume across 50+ supported blockchains
  • Smart routing compares multiple external liquidity sources to minimize slippage
Cons
  • Variable routing fees apply to non-stablecoin token swaps
  • Security depends on multiple third-party bridges and solver networks
  • Potential for slippage or execution delays during extreme liquidity shortfalls
  • Suffered a $336,000 unbacked mint exploit on its Bitcoin bridge in September 2026
  • Cross-chain transactions remain vulnerable to network congestion delays on non-EVM chains
  • High-volume routes depend heavily on protocol-owned pool liquidity
Best forNon-EVM to EVM token traders, DeFi users moving stablecoins fee-free, Developers embedding cross-chain swap widgetsSwapping between EVM networks and non-EVM chains, DeFi traders moving native Bitcoin and Solana assets, Developers integrating cross-chain swaps via SDK

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons