SimpleSwap vs tZERO

How SimpleSwap vs tZERO compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
tZERO3.4/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/53.4/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.03.0
Security & trust4.04.5
Asset selection5.02.5
Ease of use4.53.0
Support4.03.5
Specs
MarketsSpotSpot, OTC
Coins listed2,800Not disclosed
Fiat deposit methodsCardNot disclosed
KYC required No Yes
Accepts US customersNot disclosed Yes
Staking / earnNot disclosed No
Mobile app YesNot disclosed
Licenses & registrationsNot disclosedSEC-registered Broker-Dealer and ATS, SEC-registered Transfer Agent, FINRA Member, CFTC-registered DCO
Security featuresNon-custodial architecture, Direct wallet settlementsInstitutional key management, Regulated custody, API authentication
Futures & perpetuals No Yes
Copy trading No No
P2P market No No
Earn / savings productsNot disclosed No
Referral program YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20182014
Headquarters—United States
InvestorsNot disclosedIntercontinental Exchange (ICE)
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • No account registration required for standard crypto-to-crypto swaps
  • Non-custodial model delivers converted assets directly to personal wallets
  • Extensive catalog covering more than 2,800 cryptocurrencies
  • Choice between fixed guaranteed rates and floating market rates
  • Operates an SEC-registered and FINRA-member broker-dealer alternative trading system
  • Holds CFTC approval as a Derivatives Clearing Organization for derivatives clearing
  • Licensed to custody tokenized securities using its own wallet and key infrastructure
  • Backed by New York Stock Exchange parent company Intercontinental Exchange
Cons
  • Built-in exchange spreads can exceed traditional spot order-book trading fees
  • Transactions flagged by automated AML risk scoring trigger sudden KYC holds
  • No order books, limit orders, futures, or margin trading
  • Fiat purchases rely on third-party processors with separate fees and verification
  • Strict KYC and accreditation requirements restrict retail and anonymous trading
  • Does not support standard spot trading for broad retail cryptocurrency pairs
  • Custody model relies on centralized broker-dealer safekeeping rather than self-custody
  • Secondary trading liquidity remains limited relative to major crypto exchanges
Best forRegistration-free crypto-to-crypto swaps, Non-custodial cross-chain transfers, Trading rare altcoins without CEX balancesUS accredited tokenized securities investors, Institutions needing FIX-connected clearing rails, Issuers listing real-world assets compliantly

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons