Safe vs ShapeShift

How Safe vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Safe3.9/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.9/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Ease of use3.54.0
Chain support4.04.5
Features4.54.0
Privacy2.54.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, Web, Smart contract walletMobile, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereumEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swapsNot disclosed Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in appNot disclosed Yes
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Security featuresMultisig, Programmable access control, Transaction simulation, Risk scanning, Transaction guards, Spending limits, Passkey module, Recovery moduleNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase YesNot disclosed
Passkey login YesNot disclosed
Multisig YesNot disclosed
Swap feeNot disclosed0%
Company
Founded20182014
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsSignum CapitalEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Self-custodial smart contracts avoid a central asset custodian
  • 18+ independent smart account audits are listed
  • Supports 40+ EVM-compatible networks
  • Hardware wallets including Ledger can sign transactions
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • EVM-only coverage excludes Bitcoin and Solana
  • Smart contract transactions can cost more gas than regular accounts
  • Signer loss or coordination failure can block funds
  • A 2025 frontend supply-chain attack targeted a Bybit Safe
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forDAO treasury management, Company onchain accounts, Fund and protocol operationsKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons