P2P.org vs Rocket Pool

P2P.org3.9/5

VS

Rocket Pool4.2/5

Feature	P2P.orgVisit	Rocket PoolVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.9/5	4.2/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Yield	4.0	3.5
Security	4.5	4.5
Liquidity	3.0	4.0
Decentralization	4.0	5.0
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Specs
KYC required	Not disclosed	No
Type	Native staking, Restaking	Liquid staking
Stakeable assets	ETH, SOL, DOT, ATOM, XTZ, GRAM, TRX, ADA, APT, POL, TIA, HYPE, NEAR, SEI, SUI, MON	ETH
Receipt token	Not disclosed	rETH
Protocol fee	Not disclosed	14%
Minimum stake	32 ETH for Ethereum validator	0.01 ETH
Withdrawal time	Not disclosed	Instant via deposit pool buffer
Chains	Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, Polygon, Sui, Aptos, Tron, Hyperliquid, Cosmos, Other	Ethereum
Node operators	P2P.org validator infrastructure	Permissionless
Audited	Yes	Yes
Restaking	Yes	No
Slashing cover	Not disclosed	Yes
Typical reward rate	2.2% - 20.69%	2.0-2.2%
Company
Founded	2018	2016
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Coinbase Ventures, Consensys, 1kx
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over $10B in assets under validation across 40+ proof-of-stake networks Independent SOC 2 Type II certification verified by KirkpatrickPrice Zero slashing incidents recorded across seven years of validator operations MixBytes-audited smart contract infrastructure for institutional integrations	Permissionless node operator set with over 1,400 independent operators Low minimum liquid deposit of 0.01 ETH with no identity checks Requires only 4 ETH validator bonds instead of standard 32 ETH solo stakes Extensively audited by firms including Sigma Prime, Consensys Diligence, and Trail of Bits
Cons	Native Ethereum validator setup requires a minimum of 32 ETH Withdrawal timing remains subject to native chain unbonding rules and network queues EigenLayer restaking adds smart-contract risk and protocol-specific slashing conditions Primary API products and sales support cater to institutional and intermediary clients	Lower published staking yields than some larger centralized competitors Redemptions directly from the protocol depend on available deposit pool buffer liquidity Stakers remain exposed to potential node operator slashing penalties and contract bugs
Best for	Institutional digital asset treasuries, Custodians and wallet developers, Delegators seeking SOC 2-audited nodes	Decentralization-focused Ethereum stakers, Home node operators with under 32 ETH, DeFi users needing yield-bearing collateral

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons