Osmosis Labs vs THORChain
How Osmosis Labs vs THORChain compare on our ratings, dex specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.0/5 | 3.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Liquidity & pricing | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Fees | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Security | 4.0 | 2.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Chain coverage | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Type | AMM, Order book | AMM |
| Chains | Other | Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Other |
| Swap fee | Varies by pool | Source-network gas, destination-network gas and liquidity fees; total varies with network conditions, swap size and pool depth |
| Limit orders | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Cross-chain swaps | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Governance token | OSMO | RUNE |
| Perpetual futures | Not disclosed | No |
| MEV protection | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Points or rewards program | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | — |
| Investors | Paradigm, Do Kwon, Ethereal Ventures, Figment +2 | Public participants |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Cosmos ecosystem token traders, Non-custodial cross-chain swappers, Concentrated liquidity yield providers | Native Bitcoin swaps, Cross-chain self-custody trading, Wallet and app integrations |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.