NEAR Protocol vs Shardeum

How NEAR Protocol vs Shardeum compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/53.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Performance4.53.5
Fees4.54.0
Ecosystem3.52.5
Decentralization4.02.5
Developer experience4.04.0
Specs
LayerLayer 1Layer 1
Consensus / designProof of StakeProof of Stake
Native tokenNEARSHM
EVM compatible No Yes
Smart contract languagesRust, JavaScriptSolidity
Block time600ms2-3 seconds
Finality1.2sDeterministic
Validators / sequencerNot disclosed24
Mainnet since2,0202,025
Throughput (TPS)1000000Not disclosed
SequencerNot applicableNot applicable
Data availabilityNEAR ProtocolNot disclosed
Gas paid inNEARSHM
Company
Founded20202022
HeadquartersSwitzerlandSwitzerland
InvestorsAndreessen Horowitz, Accomplice, Metastable Capital, Arrington Capital +6Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Fast 1.2-second transaction finality with 600ms block times
  • Cross-chain swap execution across 35+ separate blockchain networks
  • Sub-cent execution fees on NEAR Intents transactions
  • Annual token issuance reduced from 5% to 2.5% in October 2025
  • Block production every 2 to 3 seconds with deterministic finality
  • Full EVM compatibility works directly with MetaMask and standard Solidity tooling
  • Native SHM delegation lets holders earn staking yield without running hardware
  • Raised $23.6M to back long-term infrastructure and ecosystem growth
Cons
  • Not natively EVM-compatible at the primary Layer-1 execution level
  • Cross-chain intents face reorg exposure on connected networks, including a $600K incident in April 2026
  • Historical exploits in third-party ecosystem contracts, including $3M lost on Skyward Finance in 2022
  • Relatively small active validator set of 24 nodes recorded in May 2026
  • Experienced a planned 25-minute network halt during the October 2026 v1.1.0 upgrade
  • SHM staking yield is vulnerable to token inflation and lockup schedules
  • Young application ecosystem with limited total onchain liquidity
Best forDevelopers writing smart contracts in Rust, Users swapping across chains without manual bridges, Teams deploying autonomous AI agent systemsDevelopers deploying EVM Solidity dApps, Real-world asset tokenization issuers, SHM holders seeking staking delegation

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons