CryptoReview
Submit listing

Monero GUI Wallet vs ShapeShift

How Monero GUI Wallet vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Monero GUI Wallet3.6/5
VS
ShapeShift4.2/5
Feature
Monero GUI WalletVisit
ShapeShiftVisit
Ratings
Our score3.6/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.54.0
Ease of use3.54.0
Chain support1.04.5
Features3.54.0
Privacy5.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeDesktopMobile, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsOtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsWindows, macOS, LinuxiOS, Android
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps No Yes
Staking No Yes
NFT support NoNot disclosed
Buy crypto in app No Yes
WalletConnect No Yes
Security featuresHardware wallet support, Local full node support, Blockchain pruning, Remote node connection, Tor/I2P routing compatibilityNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Passkey login NoNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser NoNot disclosed
Swap feeNot disclosed0%
Perpetuals trading NoNot disclosed
Company
Founded20142014
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Full self-custody with completely free, open-source code
  • Hardware wallet compatibility with both Trezor and Ledger
  • Blockchain pruning reduces local node storage to one-third
  • Supports both beginner remote-node and advanced local-node modes
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • Supports only the Monero network and cannot hold other cryptocurrencies
  • No mobile or browser extension version available
  • Antivirus software frequently triggers false positive security alerts on executables
  • Compromised download server delivered backdoored project binaries in November 2019
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forPrivacy-focused desktop users holding XMR, Users running independent Monero full nodes, Hardware wallet owners using Trezor or LedgerKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.