Marinade vs stakefish

Marinade4.3/5

VS

stakefish3.6/5

Feature	MarinadeVisit	stakefishVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Yield	4.5	3.5
Security	4.5	4.5
Liquidity	4.0	2.0
Decentralization	4.5	3.5
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Type	Liquid staking, Native staking	Native staking, Restaking
Stakeable assets	SOL	ETH, SOL, ADA, ATOM, POL, SUI
Receipt token	mSOL	Not disclosed
Protocol fee	Not disclosed	4.3%
Chains	Solana	Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Cosmos, Sui, Other
Node operators	Automated delegation across hundreds of Solana validators via Stake Auction Marketplace	stakefish internal infrastructure
Audited	Yes	Yes
Restaking	No	Yes
Typical reward rate	5.04% - 7.6%	~6-7% APR on Solana
Company
Founded	2021	2018
Headquarters	United States	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Supports native staking without smart contract custody exposure Liquid staking via mSOL is widely integrated across Solana DeFi Smart contracts audited by Neodyme, Ackee Blockchain, and Kudelski Security No identity verification or KYC required for retail staking	Zero percent consensus layer fee for native Ethereum validator deposits Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and withdrawal authority with delegators Runtime Verification audit completed on the Ethereum batch deposit smart contract Track record spanning over eight years without recorded slashing incidents
Cons	Limited entirely to the Solana blockchain mSOL trades at market rates and can temporarily depeg from redemption value Instant unstaking requires secondary market liquidity or pool reserves Standard native unstaking remains subject to Solana epoch withdrawal delays	Fifty percent execution layer fee reduces upside on large Ethereum MEV blocks Native Ethereum staking requires a full 32 ETH capital commitment Does not issue an in-house liquid staking receipt token for secondary market trading Unstaking speeds remain subject to protocol-level network unbonding queues
Best for	Solana DeFi liquidity providers, Users avoiding smart contract risk, Institutions using qualified custodians	Institutional stakers running full validators, Long-term holders seeking non-custodial delegation, Developers integrating multi-chain staking APIs

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons