Manifold vs sudoswap

Manifold4.0/5

VS

sudoswap3.5/5

Feature	ManifoldVisit	sudoswapVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.0/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	4.5
Selection	3.5	2.5
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Creator tools	5.0	3.0
Trust & safety	4.0	4.0
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Chains	Ethereum, Base	Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Other
Marketplace fee	Not disclosed	0.5%
Creator royalties	Enforced	Enforced
Focus	Art	Collectibles
Launchpad	Yes	Not disclosed
Aggregates other markets	No	Not disclosed
Mobile app	No	No
Token	Not disclosed	SUDO
Zero marketplace fee	Not disclosed	No
Points or rewards program	No	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2020	2022
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Smart contracts remain fully owned and controlled by the creator wallet No identity verification or KYC needed to mint or purchase Supports Ethereum, Base, and OP Mainnet network deployments Built-in burn-and-redeem and open edition drop mechanics	Platform trading fee is 0.5% Provides instant liquidity without waiting for individual counterparty bids Non-custodial trading across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Berachain Public smart contract audits published on GitHub
Cons	Secondary trading volume and fee revenue are low compared to major aggregators Asset uploads depend on Arweave availability and can experience downtime Creators must manage their own contract deployment gas costs	Low liquidity on smaller collections leads to high price slippage TVL of about $1.03M limits capacity for large NFT trades No mobile application for iOS or Android
Best for	Digital artists deploying independent contracts, Creators hosting burn-and-redeem drops, Collectors buying 1-of-1 Ethereum art	NFT liquidity providers, Traders needing instant pool execution, Arbitrageurs trading floor-price collections

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons