Manifold vs Solanart

Manifold4.0/5

VS

Solanart3.5/5

Feature	ManifoldVisit	SolanartVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.0/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	4.0
Selection	3.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Creator tools	5.0	3.5
Trust & safety	4.0	3.5
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Chains	Ethereum, Base	Solana
Creator royalties	Enforced	Optional
Focus	Art	Art, Collectibles
Launchpad	Yes	Yes
Aggregates other markets	No	No
Mobile app	No	No
Points or rewards program	No	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2020	2021
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Smart contracts remain fully owned and controlled by the creator wallet No identity verification or KYC needed to mint or purchase Supports Ethereum, Base, and OP Mainnet network deployments Built-in burn-and-redeem and open edition drop mechanics	No KYC required for secondary market trading or listings Handled over 4.85 million SOL in cumulative trading volume Features customizable marketplace and creator royalty configurations Offers integrated liquidity access through NFT-backed loans
Cons	Secondary trading volume and fee revenue are low compared to major aggregators Asset uploads depend on Arweave availability and can experience downtime Creators must manage their own contract deployment gas costs	Limited solely to the Solana blockchain with no cross-chain support Secondary trading liquidity is lower than modern Solana aggregators No mobile application for iOS or Android devices
Best for	Digital artists deploying independent contracts, Creators hosting burn-and-redeem drops, Collectors buying 1-of-1 Ethereum art	Solana digital art collectors, Early Solana collection traders, Holders seeking NFT-backed loans

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons