LightLink vs NEAR Protocol

LightLink3.2/5

VS

NEAR Protocol4.1/5

Feature	LightLinkVisit	NEAR ProtocolVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.2/5	4.1/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Performance	4.0	4.5
Fees	4.5	4.5
Ecosystem	2.0	3.5
Decentralization	2.5	4.0
Developer experience	3.5	4.0
Specs
Layer	Layer 2	Layer 1
Consensus / design	Optimistic rollup	Proof of Stake
Native token	LL	NEAR
EVM compatible	Yes	No
Smart contract languages	Solidity	Rust, JavaScript
Block time	~0.5s	600ms
Typical transaction fee	$0.01	Not disclosed
Finality	0.5s	1.2s
Mainnet since	2,023	2,020
Throughput (TPS)	10000+	1000000
Sequencer	Not disclosed	Not applicable
Data availability	Celestia	NEAR Protocol
Gas paid in	ETH	NEAR
Company
Founded	2017	2020
Headquarters	—	Switzerland
Investors	MQDC, T&B Media Global, Aweh Ventures, B3V +5	Andreessen Horowitz, Accomplice, Metastable Capital, Arrington Capital +6
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Zero gas fees for end users when interacting with Enterprise Mode contracts Standard transaction fees average roughly $0.01 outside enterprise allocations Full EVM equivalence allows developers to deploy standard Solidity code unchanged Fast execution with blocks landing approximately every 0.5 seconds	Fast 1.2-second transaction finality with 600ms block times Cross-chain swap execution across 35+ separate blockchain networks Sub-cent execution fees on NEAR Intents transactions Annual token issuance reduced from 5% to 2.5% in October 2025
Cons	Uses Celestia data availability instead of direct Ethereum Layer 1 call data Sequencing and network infrastructure remain centralized Bybit delisted the native LL token in January 2026 DeFi liquidity remains low, with total value locked under $25,000 in October 2026	Not natively EVM-compatible at the primary Layer-1 execution level Cross-chain intents face reorg exposure on connected networks, including a $600K incident in April 2026 Historical exploits in third-party ecosystem contracts, including $3M lost on Skyward Finance in 2022
Best for	Enterprises subsidizing consumer transactions, Web3 games requiring gasless interactions, Developers seeking EVM compatibility with sub-cent fees	Developers writing smart contracts in Rust, Users swapping across chains without manual bridges, Teams deploying autonomous AI agent systems

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons