CryptoReview
Submit listing

Klever Wallet vs ShapeShift

How Klever Wallet vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Klever Wallet4.0/5
VS
ShapeShift4.2/5
Feature
Klever WalletVisit
ShapeShiftVisit
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.54.0
Ease of use4.54.0
Chain support4.54.5
Features4.04.0
Privacy4.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, Browser extensionMobile, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Polygon, Tron, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, Android, ChromeiOS, Android
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking Yes Yes
NFT support YesNot disclosed
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Built-in dApp browser YesNot disclosed
Swap feeNot disclosed0%
Company
Founded20202014
HeadquartersPortugalSwitzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Non-custodial architecture giving users full control of private keys
  • Supports over 10,000 tokens and NFTs across 40 blockchains
  • No registration or KYC required for holding or swapping tokens
  • Hardware wallet support through KleverSafe integration
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • Swap discounts require holding the proprietary KLV token
  • Fiat purchases require external partner KYC verification
  • Built-in swaps incur variable facilitation fees in addition to network fees
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forMultichain mobile crypto holders, Users staking proof-of-stake assets, Traders wanting non-KYC swapsKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons

Klever Wallet vs Gem WalletCake Wallet vs Klever WalletKeplr vs Klever WalletKlever Wallet vs Status