Kelp DAO vs Rocket Pool

How Kelp DAO vs Rocket Pool compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.3/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield4.03.5
Security2.04.5
Liquidity4.04.0
Decentralization3.05.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed No
TypeLiquid restakingLiquid staking
Stakeable assetsETH, stETH, ETHxETH
Receipt tokenrsETHrETH
Protocol feeNot disclosed14%
Minimum stakeNot disclosed0.01 ETH
Withdrawal timeNot disclosedInstant via deposit pool buffer
ChainsEthereumEthereum
Node operatorsNot disclosedPermissionless
Audited Yes Yes
Restaking Yes No
Slashing coverNot disclosed Yes
Typical reward rateNot disclosed2.0-2.2%
Company
Founded20232016
Headquarters——
InvestorsLaser Digital, SCB Limited, Alex Karl Svanevik, Amrit Kumar +22Coinbase Ventures, Consensys, 1kx
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Retains liquidity via rsETH while earning restaking rewards
  • Accepts both native ETH and established liquid staking tokens
  • Chainlink CCIP integration for transfers across multiple layer-2 networks
  • Supported across more than 40 DeFi platforms and lending pools
  • Permissionless node operator set with over 1,400 independent operators
  • Low minimum liquid deposit of 0.01 ETH with no identity checks
  • Requires only 4 ETH validator bonds instead of standard 32 ETH solo stakes
  • Extensively audited by firms including Sigma Prime, Consensys Diligence, and Trail of Bits
Cons
  • Suffered a $292 million cross-chain bridge exploit in April 2026
  • Exposes holders to layered slashing risk across multiple validation services
  • Subject to rsETH secondary market depeg risks during market volatility
  • Lower published staking yields than some larger centralized competitors
  • Redemptions directly from the protocol depend on available deposit pool buffer liquidity
  • Stakers remain exposed to potential node operator slashing penalties and contract bugs
Best forRestaking native ETH and stETH, DeFi liquidity providers on L2s, Yield farming with restaked assetsDecentralization-focused Ethereum stakers, Home node operators with under 32 ETH, DeFi users needing yield-bearing collateral

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons