Kalshi vs OG.com

How Kalshi vs OG.com compare on our ratings, prediction market specs, funding, pros and cons.

Kalshi4.3/5
VS
OG.com3.9/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Market selection4.54.0
Liquidity4.54.0
Fees4.03.0
Resolution quality4.54.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
Market typesPolitics, Sports, Crypto, Economics, Culture, WeatherSports, Politics, Economics, Culture
Settles inUSDUSD
ChainsOtherNot disclosed
Trading feesModel fee rounded to $0.000001 precision with balance rounding feesNot disclosed
Resolution sourceOfficial government and industry statistics, primary source reportingCrypto.com Derivatives North America clearinghouse and official data sources
Available in the US Yes Yes
KYC required Yes Yes
Regulated venue Yes Yes
Market topicsElections, Macroeconomics, Sports, Cryptocurrency, Weather, Financial IndicesSports, Politics, Economics, Culture, Entertainment
Mobile appNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20182026
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsBaillie Gifford, Layer Global, TCV, Coatue +9Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Registered Designated Contract Market status provides federal regulatory oversight for US-based traders
  • Deep liquidity exceeding $2B in weekly volume across major events in May 2026
  • Transparent dollar-denominated balances eliminate stablecoin depeg risks
  • Subpenny orderbook precision down to $0.0001 allows fine-grained execution
  • Operates under CFTC DCM and DCO regulatory status in the United States
  • Direct legal access for US residents with domestic regulatory oversight
  • Clear institutional liquidity routing via partnerships with FanDuel and Robinhood
  • Broad selection of regulated sports contracts alongside political and economic markets
Cons
  • Requires full identity verification (KYC), preventing anonymous participation
  • Centralized custody of cash balances without on-chain asset withdrawals
  • Subject to regulatory exclusions, including a 2026 trading ban on US Senate staff
  • Unprofitable to profitable user ratio reached 2.9 to 1 in 2026
  • Requires full KYC verification, preventing pseudonymous trading
  • Centralized custody rather than self-custodial smart contract settlements
  • Subject to strict US derivatives jurisdiction and event approval rules
Best forUS residents wanting regulated event contracts, Quantitative traders using FIX and REST APIs, Sports bettors preferring central orderbook pricingUS residents seeking regulated markets, Traders focusing on sports outcomes, Users avoiding onchain gas fees

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons