Jupiter Lend vs Lendroid

Jupiter Lend4.0/5

VS

Lendroid2.0/5

Feature	Jupiter LendVisit	LendroidVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.0/5	2.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security & track record	4.5	2.0
Rates	4.0	2.5
Market depth	3.5	1.0
Ease of use	4.5	1.0
Decentralization	3.5	3.5
Specs
KYC required	No	Not disclosed
Lending model	Pooled	Not disclosed
Chains	Solana	Ethereum
Audited	Yes	Not disclosed
Governance token	JUP	LST
Own stablecoin	Not disclosed	No
Rates	Variable	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2025	2017
Headquarters	—	Singapore
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over $1B in total value locked across Solana lending markets Security reviewed by Certora, OtterSec, Neodyme, and Code4rena Requires no KYC or account registration to lend or borrow Native mobile app integration allows managing positions on smartphones	Smart contracts and modules are fully open source for community inspection Non-rent-seeking model operates without native commission fees Non-custodial architecture with no identity verification requirements
Cons	Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain ecosystem Variable borrowing rates can spike sharply during periods of high utilization Borrowers risk automated liquidation if collateral asset values decline	Ceased all operations in December 2022 with no active maintenance No active hosted application or official operational liquidity pools Native LST token utility is obsolete following the shutdown Lacks ongoing security monitoring and bug bounty coverage
Best for	Solana DeFi yield depositors, Traders borrowing against crypto collateral, Mobile users seeking onchain lending	Developers studying legacy DeFi architectures, Researchers analyzing open-source lending contracts, Teams reviewing NFT fractionalization code

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons