Hyperliquid vs rhino.fi

Hyperliquid3.4/5

VS

rhino.fi4.0/5

Feature	HyperliquidVisit	rhino.fiVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.4/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Liquidity & pricing	4.5	4.0
Fees	3.0	3.5
Security	3.0	4.0
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Chain coverage	2.5	4.5
Specs
Type	Order book, Perpetuals	Not disclosed
Chains	Hyperliquid, Arbitrum	Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, TON, Tron, Other
Limit orders	Yes	Not disclosed
Cross-chain swaps	Not disclosed	Yes
Audited	Yes	Yes
Governance token	HYPE	DVF
Perpetual futures	Yes	No
Max leverage (x)	40	Not disclosed
Routes across other DEXs	No	No
Company
Founded	—	2019
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Fully onchain order book with transparent liquidations Reported $7.2B in 24-hour volume Perpetual leverage reaches 40x for BTC's first margin tier Non-custodial trading model	Near-instant cross-chain execution settling in under 10 seconds Covers more than 30 blockchains including EVM networks, Solana, Tron, and Bitcoin Proprietary liquidity network eliminates third-party DEX aggregator slippage Smart contracts audited by PeckShield and CryptoExperts
Cons	JELLY settlement at $0.0095 raised validator-centralization concerns HLP lost about $4M in a March 2025 ETH liquidation Bridge audit excluded the front end and off-chain components	No swapping into ETH or BNB when bridging across chains Enterprise API access requires fixed monthly subscription plans Mandatory KYT screening applies to incoming deposits Sending from smart contracts is restricted on selected networks like Base
Best for	Onchain perpetual traders, Order-book spot traders, Builders using HyperCore liquidity	Cross-chain stablecoin bridging, Fintechs needing multi-chain deposits, Merchants accepting crypto payments

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons