HIVE Digital Technologies vs Luxor
How HIVE Digital Technologies vs Luxor compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.1/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Costs & fees | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Transparency | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Scale & reliability | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Support | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Public miner, Hosting | Mining pool, Firmware & software |
| Coins | BTC | Not disclosed |
| Pool fee | Not disclosed | 2.5% (custom down to 0.7%, 0% with LuxOS) |
| Payout schemes | Not disclosed | FPPS, Fixed, Upfront |
| Hashrate | 25.1 EH/s | >40 EH/s |
| Stock ticker | NASDAQ: HIVE, TSX: HIVE | Not disclosed |
| Locations | Canada, Sweden, Paraguay | United States |
| Energy sources | Hydroelectric | Not disclosed |
| Hardware models | ASIC, NVIDIA GPUs | Antminer S19, Antminer S19 Pro, Antminer Z15 Pro, Whatsminer M50S, Whatsminer M60 |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | CMT Digital, Black Creek Digital, Hivemind Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Equity investors seeking Bitcoin mining exposure, Enterprises requiring GPU cloud compute, Institutions tracking green data center infrastructure | Commercial ASIC mining operations, Miners seeking hashprice hedging tools, Data centers managing ERCOT power costs |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

