Garden vs Squid
How Garden vs Squid compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.3/5 | 4.4/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Speed | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Fees | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Chain coverage | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Design | Intent-based | Aggregator |
| Chains | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Cosmos, Other |
| Chains supported | 8 | 100 |
| Typical fee | Not disclosed | 0% on stablecoin swaps; variable route and gas fees |
| Typical transfer time | As little as 30 seconds | 5s |
| Security model | Hash Time-Locked Contracts with an off-chain solver layer and trustless atomic settlement | Depends on the underlying route |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Token | SEED | QUID |
| Intent-based | Yes | Yes |
| Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | 2022 |
| Headquarters | — | Virgin Islands, British |
| Investors | Not disclosed | North Island Ventures, Polychain Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Direct native Bitcoin cross-chain transfers, Users avoiding centralized wrapped asset custodians, Multi-chain traders bridging to EVM and Sui | Non-EVM to EVM token traders, DeFi users moving stablecoins fee-free, Developers embedding cross-chain swap widgets |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

