Foundry vs OCEAN
How Foundry vs OCEAN compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 3.9/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Costs & fees | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Transparency | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Scale & reliability | 5.0 | 3.5 |
| Support | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Mining pool, Firmware & software | Mining pool |
| Coins | BTC, ZEC | BTC |
| Pool fee | 0% | 1% (DATUM) to 2% |
| Payout schemes | FPPS | TIDES |
| Minimum payout | 0.001 BTC | 0.01048576 BTC (on-chain) |
| Hashrate | Not disclosed | 22.15 EH/s |
| Locations | United States | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2019 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | United States | — |
| Investors | Digital Currency Group | Jack Dorsey |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | North American institutional Bitcoin miners, Commercial hosting facility operators, Enterprise entities seeking FPPS payouts | Miners seeking non-custodial payouts, Operators running independent Bitcoin nodes, Small miners using Lightning payouts |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.