Flexa vs Radom

Flexa4.1/5

VS

Radom3.5/5

Feature	FlexaVisit	RadomVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.1/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	4.5	3.5
Integrations	4.0	4.0
Settlement options	4.5	4.0
Reliability	4.5	3.0
Support	3.0	3.0
Specs
Processing fee	Not disclosed	0.5%
Settlement	Crypto, Stablecoins, Fiat, Auto-conversion	Crypto, Fiat
Coins supported	99	12
Integrations	Base Pay, iOS SDK, Android SDK, React Native SDK	Shopify
Invoicing	Not disclosed	Yes
Recurring payments	Not disclosed	Yes
Mass payouts	Yes	Yes
Point of sale	Yes	Not disclosed
Self-hosted option	No	No
Business verification (KYB)	Yes	Not disclosed
Settle in stablecoins	Yes	Yes
Merchant countries	United States, Canada, El Salvador	Not disclosed
API & SDKs	Yes	Yes
Company
Founded	2018	2023
Headquarters	United States	Cook Islands
Investors	Pantera Capital, 1kx, Access Ventures, Nima Capital	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Supports 99+ digital assets Lists 0% conversion and custody fees on payouts Offers online, in-app and point-of-sale acceptance Supports self-custody wallets through mobile SDKs	Supports 12+ cryptocurrencies across 10+ blockchains Offers crypto or fiat settlement options Provides hosted checkout and no-code payment links Supports 410+ wallets
Cons	Merchant coverage varies by country and regulatory requirements AMP collateral adds technical and token-system dependency Crypto payment mistakes are generally irreversible Specific asset and network availability depends on integration	Charges 0.5% + $0.50 per transaction Fiat services depend on banking and financial partners No self-hosted option Founded in 2023, giving it a short operating history
Best for	Multichannel crypto acceptance, Self-custody wallet integrations, SEPA-region merchants	Businesses accepting crypto online, Subscription-based crypto merchants, Developers building payment flows

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons