Fireblocks vs Ledger Enterprise

How Fireblocks vs Ledger Enterprise compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.5
Compliance4.02.5
Asset support5.04.5
Features4.54.5
Support4.04.0
Specs
Custody modelQualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody softwareHSM, Multi-sig, Self-custody software
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, CorporatesInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated YesNot disclosed
SOC 2 report YesNot disclosed
InsuranceNot disclosedAdd-on specie policies via a program underwritten by Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd; some clients covered up to $750M
Assets supportedNot disclosed5,000
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersNYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US)Not disclosed
MPC YesNot disclosed
Cold storage YesNot disclosed
Qualified custodian Yes No
Company
Founded—2014
HeadquartersUnited StatesFrance
InvestorsD1 Capital Partners, Spark CapitalNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Qualified custody through NYDFS-chartered Fireblocks Trust alongside self-custody software
  • Thousands of assets across more than 200 blockchains
  • SOC 2 Type 2 with zero material findings, plus ISO 27001 and CCSS QSP Level 3
  • Air-gapped MPC cold wallet and an HSM option (KeyLink) for banks
  • Keys generated and used inside FIPS 140-2 Level 3 HSMs, with quorum rules enforced in firmware
  • Clear Signing on Ledger devices for every approval
  • Tradelink off-exchange settlement with custodians including Komainu and Tangany
  • Over 5,000 coins and tokens, with full staking access on six networks
Cons
  • Key-loss claims from StakeHound and the Celsius plan administrator
  • Licenses are US-only, with no MiCA or other non-US authorization listed
  • Custom plans start at $36,000 a year
  • Holds no custody license, so regulated custody needs a partner
  • SOC 2 Type 2 is self-reported in an FAQ; ISO 27001 still in progress
  • Each approver needs Ledger hardware, and the iOS app requires a Ledger Stax
Best forExchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label walletsBanks and custodians building their own digital asset custody service, Exchanges that want wallet policies enforced in hardware, Asset managers trading off-exchange through Tradelink

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons